ACT Tucson/Marana AZ Chapter Website
ACT Tucson/Marana AZ Chapter Website




The Muslim Brotherhood in America


While much has been written on the terrorist organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood, for the most part the majority of Americans continue to remain unaware of this nefarious organization as it operates freely in America under a litany of various front organizations posing as charities and civil rights groups. Although terrorist groups like al-Qaeda, the Islamic State (ISIS), and Hamas have clear tactical differences, they both share the exact same ideology and goals. In fact, al-Qaeda, Hamas, and ISIS would not exist today if it wasn’t for the Muslim Brotherhood which birthed these groups through the teachings of ideologues like Hasan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb. It is no understatement to say that the Muslim Brotherhood has inspired the entire modern Islamic terrorist enterprise.

Yet, too much attention has been given to groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS as they seek to bring about their ultimate goal of establishing Sharia law via the “Caliphate” through violence. The spotlight has been virtually ignored on the Muslim Brotherhood though as they seek the same goal of Sharia but through a gradual, termite-like approach that burrows deeply into a host society by eating away it’s institutions slowly from within. These are the two tactical differences that Americans need to become aware of as the former has virtually controlled the narrative while the latter is whitewashed away as not irrelevant. The Muslim Brotherhood in America has acquired positions of influence behind the scenes in the government, academia, and even the media with little to no resistance. For the Brotherhood, it all begins with the establishment of various innocuous sounding Islamic organizations created at the grassroots level which eventually serve the purposes of evolving into breeding grounds for radicalization.

More than thirty years ago the Muslim Brotherhood laid out a twelve point strategy to put up a false front of peace while acting covertly to subvert the Western world in a document that came to be known as “The Project“. The document was recovered by Swiss authorities as they raided the lakeside villa of the Brotherhoods’ then foreign minister Youseff Nada shortly after the September 11th attacks on the United States. The document was written in 1982 and it outlines a strategy for the Muslim Brotherhood to “establish an Islamic government on earth.”

Patrick Poole, a counter-terrorism consultant and National Security and Terrorism Correspondent for PJ Media, notes that “what makes The Project so different from the standard ‘Death of America! Death to Israel!’ and ‘Establish the global caliphate!’ Islamist rhetoric is that it represents a flexible, multi-phased, long-term approach to the ‘cultural invasion’ of the West. Calling for the utilization of various tactics, ranging from immigration, infiltration, surveillance, propaganda, protest, deception, political legitimacy and terrorism, The Project has served for more than two decades as the Muslim Brotherhood master plan.”

Rather than focusing on terrorism as the sole method of group action, as is the case with Al-Qaeda, Hamas, ISIS, and various other terrorist organizations, the use of terror falls into a multiplicity of options available to progressively infiltrate, confront, and eventually establish Islamic domination over the West. Poole highlights a few of the following tactics and techniques that are among the many recommendations made in The Project:

Avoiding open alliances with known terrorist organizations and individuals to maintain the appearance of “moderation”.

Infiltrating and taking over existing Muslim organizations to realign them towards the Muslim Brotherhood’s collective goals.

Establishing financial networks to fund the work of conversion of the West, including the support of full-time administrators and workers.

Cultivating an Islamist intellectual community, including the establishment of think-tanks and advocacy groups, and publishing “academic” studies, to legitimize Islamist positions and to chronicle the history of Islamist movements.

Inflaming violence and keeping Muslims living in the West “in a jihad frame of mind”.

Supporting jihad movements across the Muslim world through preaching, propaganda, personnel, funding, and technical and operational support.

Collecting sufficient funds to indefinitely perpetuate and support jihad around the world.

While these are just a few of the key bullet points outlined in the document, one only needs to look towards a 2005 report conducted by the Dutch on the Muslim Brotherhood clandestine infiltration in the Netherlands to get an idea of how the strategy operates within western society. The report, titled From Dawa to Jihad: The various threats from radical Islam to the democratic legal order explains that their exists in the Netherlands “radical branches of the Muslim Brotherhood which employs covert dawa (propagation of radical Islamic ideology and appeal to convert people to become Muslim) strategies that seek to gradually undermine it (the State) by infiltrating, and eventually taking over the civil service, the judicature, schools, local administrators, etc.”

Aiming at a clandestine infiltration of political and social institutions, the 2005 report goes on to state that their are also conceivable, for example, “attempts to infiltrate community-based organisations with the aim of monopolising them (thus obstructing the proper functioning of ‘civil society’). But in the long run, more serious forms of such covert subversion are also conceivable, for example attempts by radical Islamic organisations to infiltrate local administration, the judicature et cetera, whilst concealing their actual objectives and loyalties.”

“While the instigators themselves do not wish to openly present themselves as jihadists or even be associated with armed jihadists, they wish to promote violence in a covert way,” concludes the report. As we can see the influence of “The Project” not only matches exactly what is happening in the Netherlands, but also aligns identically to the Muslim Brotherhood’s 1991 Explanatory Memorandum On the General Strategic Goal for the Group In North America. This memo, meant for Brotherhood operatives working within the United States, explains the strategy behind the establishment of an Islamic Center in every city.

The memo notes, “The center we seek is the one which constitutes the ‘axis’ of our Movement, the ‘perimeter’ of the circle of our work, our ‘balance center’, the ‘base’ for our rise and our ‘Dar al-Arqam’ to educate us, prepare us and supply our battalions in addition to being the ‘niche” of our prayers. This is in order for the Islamic center to turn – in action not in words – into a seed ‘for a small Islamic society’ which is a reflection and a mirror to our central organizations.”

For an example on how this works in America, Erick Stakelbeck in his book The Brotherhood: America’s Next Great Enemy illustrates how the Brotherhood goes about establishing their Centers in the following illustration:

An Islamist organization—usually linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and flush with cash from Saudi Arabia and/or the Gulf states—spends big bucks to buy up several acres of property in a town where hardly any Muslims reside. Plans are announced to build an ‘Islamic Cultural Center’ where all faiths are welcome and diversity will be celebrated in a new, multiculti mini-utopia. But blindsided local residents, after doing some research, quickly learn of the nefarious connections of the mosque’s leadership and see a potential hub for terrorist plotting in their midst—one with financial backing from overseas radicals to boot.

Yet, when these same neighbors demand to know where the money is coming from to pay for the planned mega-mosque, smooth-talking Muslim spokesmen involved with the project just smile and calmly reassure all comers that the funds have been “locally raised.” The local city council, petrified of being called racist, ultimately approves the so-called Islamic center against the will of the people. On cue, the mainstream media and Islamic groups then team up to condemn critics of the mosque as “bigots” and “Islamophobes.” Neighbors are left feeling demonized, abandoned, angry, and alone. And the mosque is built—even though its leadership has been exposed as having ties to the extremist Muslim Brotherhood, a hatred for Israel, and a fondness for sharia law.

Examples such as this can be seen virtually everywhere throughout the United States and represent a direct threat to Americans as the mosque nexus to terrorism can be found in the majority of cases in which the arrest or the attack of a “homegrown jihadist” hits the news. The reason for this is because these mosques are operating in the exact way described by both “The Project” and the 1991 memorandum.

In what should have been a major wake up call to law enforcement and those working within national security, a 2011 study originally published by the  Middle East Quarterly and examined in depth by Perspectives on Terrorism ,the correlation between sharia adherence and violent dogma in U.S. mosques is found to be shockingly high. In a random survey of 100 representative mosques in the U.S., the Shariah Adherence Mosque Survey found that 80% provide their worshipers with jihad-style literature promoting the use of violence against non-believers and that the imams in those mosques expressly promote that literature.

The study explains that the texts were selected for scoring based on the fact that they either called for violent jihad against non-Muslims or because the texts called for hatred of “the other.” For example, Reliance of the Traveller by Ahmad Ibn Lulu Ibn Al-NaqibThe Fiqh-us-Sunnahand Tafsir Ibn Kathirand authors including Maulana Maududi and Muslim Brotherhood ideologue Sayed Qutb  were selected because their texts make explicit demands for jihad against non-Muslims. As the study states, “texts authored by Maududi and Qutb and similar materials, such as pamphlets and texts published and disseminated by the Muslim Brotherhood, were selected in part because these materials strongly advocate the use of violence as a means to establish an Islamic state.” Remember, 80% of mosques surveyed carried such material, directly indicating that the Brotherhood is more than influential and flourishing within these mosques.

The study found that when a mosque imam or its worshipers were “sharia-adherent,” as measured by certain behaviors in conformity with Islamic law, the mosque was more likely to provide this violent literature and the imam was more likely to promote it. Moreover, the study also found that of the 80% of mosques that contained severe materials:

100% were led by an imam who recommended that worshipers study violent materials;

100% promoted violent jihad;

98% promoted the financial support of terror;

98% promoted the establishment of the Caliphate in the United States;

100% praised terror against the West;

and 76% invited guest speakers known to have promoted violent jihad.


The survey’s results help to provide insight into the role that Sharia-adherent behaviors play in defining group identities, creating an us-versus-them outlook, and projecting violence against the West and non-Muslims, which is mirrored by the Sharia literature found in the mosques prone to violent literature. Ultimately, the survey concludes by suggesting that “Islam, at least as it is generally practiced in mosques across the United States, continues to manifest a resistance to a sufficiently tolerant religio-legal framework that would allow its followers to make a sincere affirmation of Western citizenship. This survey provides empirical support for the view that mosques across the U.S., as institutional and social settings for mosque-going Muslims, provide a milieu resistant to, the legal, theological, or political arguments that make political, civic, and social cooperation within a secular constitutional political order ideal.”

By providing the ideological breeding grounds for terrorists, mosques and various Islamic centers within the U.S. serve as a critical starting point in which the radicalization, justification, and resources for committing jihad is prevalent. So where are these mosques and Islamic centers located and can it be shown that they are tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and have produced jihadists?

To answer both questions all we need to do is look at a few examples of various instances in which either a jihadist has been arrested, carried out an attack, or joined a terrorist organization and note which mosque or center they attended as well if its linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

The first mosque examined is the notorious Islamic Society of Boston (ISB). The ISB is owned and operated by the Muslim American Society (MAS) which federal prosecutors described in a 2008 case as being an “overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America.” So far at least 8 former attendees to the mosque have become jihadists including the following; The boston marathon bombers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev; Abdurahman Alamoudi, the mosque’s founder and first president, who in 2004 was sentenced to 23 years in prison for plotting terrorism. In 2005, the Treasury Department issued a statement saying Alamoudi raised money for al Qaeda in the U.S.; Aafia Siddiqui, an MIT scientist-turned-al Qaeda agent, who in 2010 was sentenced to 86 years in prison for planning a New York chemical attack; Finally, there’s Ahmad Abousamra, who was eventually killed in 2015 but not before becoming one of the top media propagandists for the terrorist group known today as the Islamic State or ISIS.

Next, we have the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix (ICCP) whose own website declares that it is “entrusted with the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT). The importance of this cannot be understated as NAIT’s status as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity was confirmed by federal prosecutors during the 2009 prosecution of another U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity named the Holy Land Foundation. The Justice Department designated NAIT as an unindicted co-conspiratorin that case. So far at least 4 former attendees to the Islamic Center in Phoenix are known jihadists. The most notorious are Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi who were killed last year while attempting to execute people holding a draw Mohammed cartoon contest in Garland, Texas. Yet, as Patrick Poole of PJ Media notes, “two other previous ICCP mosque attendees — Hassan Abu-Jihaad and Derrick Shareef are currently in federal prison on terrorism-related charges.”

Most recently, and unfortunately tragically, is the Islamic Society of Corona/Norco (ISCN) which was attended by the San Bernardino jihadist Syed Farook and his friend as well as financier and arms supplier Enrique Marquez. According the federal complaint filed against Marquez he was charged with conspiring with Farook in 2011 and 2012 to commit crimes of terrorism, as well as unlawfully purchasing two assault rifles used in the San Bernardino massacre and defrauding immigration authorities by entering into a sham marriage conducted at the ISCN. The federal complaint also states that in 2012 Marquez and Farook were planning on carrying out an attack on a busy California freeway as well as a local community college but scrapped their plan as Marquez stated that he “distanced himself from Farook and ceased plotting with him after 2012 for a variety of reasons, including the arrest of Ralph Deleon and others on material support [for terrorism] charges in November 2012.” This statement by Marquez indicates that he knew whoRalph Deleon was, this is important to note because Deleon along with three others were charged on November 16, 2012, for conspiring to provide material support and resources to terrorists. All four men in that case were from the Riverside/San Bernardino area and according to the federal complaint, one of the informants for the FBI was told by Deleon that there were “a couple of brothers from the mosque who wanted to [travel abroad] for jihad.” While the FBI doesn’t identify which mosque, one can guess which one Deleon & his “brothers” were attending. 

Finally, we have the example of the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center (DAH) located in Falls Church, Virginia. “Dar al-Hijrah, which fittingly means Land of Migration, is where the Brotherhood has settled in America,” writes former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy in his book The Grand JihadMcCarthy elaborates on Dar al-Hijrah explaining that, “in the shadow of the White House and Capitol Hill, it is the optimal location as the $6 million complex was established in 1991, the same year the Brotherhood playbook was written…The Dar al-Hijrah complex was purchased in the 1980s by the North American Islamic Trust. The Islamic Affairs Department of the Saudi embassy in Washington chipped in for the construction and the trustee was the Muslim Brotherhood operative Jamal Barzinji.” Supporting McCarthy’s claim, according to a 2002Customs and Border Protection document, DAH is stated as “operating as a front for Hamas operatives in U.S.” while a December 2007 document says it “has been linked to numerous individuals linked to terrorism financing” and “has also been associated with encouraging fraudulent marriages.”

Some of Dar al-Hijrah’s most infamous congregants have included Omar Abu Ali, who is now serving life in prison for joining al-Qaeda while also having plotted mass murder attacks against the United States and conspiring to murder former President George W. Bush. Then we have Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour, who are now better known for crashing Flight 77 into the Pentagon, just a short distance away from the Land of Migration. Adding to the list is probably the most infamous and, thanks to a drone strike in 2011, now deceased former Imam by the name ofAnwar al-AwlakiBefore going on to become the leader of the al-Qaeda affiliate in Yemen, al-Awlaki was the spiritual leader of Dar al-Hijrah and in 2001 the mosque just so happened to feature a worshiper by the name of Nidal Hassan. Hassan, now known as the Ft. Hood jihadist, went on a killing spree in a 2009 attack as he opened fire on his fellow soldiers killing 13 and wounding 30 at the Texas military base.

From Boston to California and Phoenix to Virginia, these four examples alone epitomize the threat posed to America by the ideological machinery of the Muslim Brotherhood. Yet, in the face of such evidence none of these mosques or Islamic Centers have been investigated let alone shut down for their ties to terrorism. Instead we are told by various Brotherhood front organizations such as theCouncil on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) that these mosques and centers in no way, shape, or form serve as the ideological springboard for the promotion of violence. This, of course, serves the purposes of obfuscating the truth as the facts have repeatedly shown that the first step on the road to jihadist terrorism is the instruction in Islamist ideology.

The Islamist threat is very real and is the result of decades of networking, infrastructure building, and intellectual as well as ideological preparation. It is advancing at an unprecedented speed as it actively and openly creates a fifth column of activists, jihadists, and apologists who work tirelessly to undermine the very foundations of America with the establishment of new mosques and Islamic centers. It cannot be stressed enough that the very ideology that the Muslim Brotherhood supports is at the root of the majority of Islamic terrorist groups in the world today and without acknowledging the ideology America itself stands no chance in even beginning to fight.

So the next time a jihadist attack happens on American soil and representatives from organizations like CAIR immediately crawl out of their holes in an attempt to act as apologists for the jihadist, remember that they themselves are directly responsible for supporting the ideology that promotes jihad.

As the Brotherhood creed goes, “Allah is our objective; the Koran is our law; the Prophet is our leader; jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.”



Bulgarian Parliament moves to Criminalize Radical Islam” and Promotion of Sharia and the Caliphate

Dec 9, 2017 9:58 am By Christine Douglass-Williams 10 Comments
The Bulgarian parliament has moved to criminalise the promotion of radical Islam, including advocating a caliphate, religious violence, and sharia law.
Kudos to Bulgaria for tackling political Islam head on and making the important point that the “change in law was not aimed at targeting a religion but a dangerous ideology.”

 As stated by UP Member of Parliament Boris Yachev:


Radical Islam is a particularly aggressive and dangerous ideology that justifies violence and the murder of [infidels]

The article goes on to say that Yachev was “insisting it also excused ‘slavery and genocide’ as a ‘systemic policy.’”
Yachev’s words are not difficult to grasp, but many will refer to such truths as “Islamophobic.” The only notable issue in the quote is that Yachev is not “insisting” anything of his own accord. What he describes is in plain black and white in the Quran and Sunnah.
Of course not all Muslims live in accordance with such texts, but those texts are there, and adhered to by enough Muslims to require Western governments to take action to protect their culture and citizens against those who adhere to them.
Promoting any ideology of violence or one threatening the law and constitution of the nation could be punishable with one to five years in jail and a fine of around £2,000, the Bulgarian newspaper Dnevnik reports.
Bulgaria should be congratulated, and should serve as a model nation in its recognition of the Islamic ideology. That ideology is indeed invoked by those committing jihad attacks, as well as by those practicing female genital mutilation, sex slavery, the persecution of infidels and apostates, the murder of gays and the like. 
Let’s also hope that Bulgaria researches and take a further step to outlaw stealth jihad groups that are found to have ties to recognized terrorist organizations (such as unindicted co-conspirators to terrorism). For example, even the United Arab Emirates deemed the “unindicted co-conspirator” CAIR to be a terrorist entity. These stealth organizations also shield jihadists by means of their incessant victimology narrative and promotion of the word “Islamophobia” to beat down legitimate criticism of Islam.
“The Bulgarian parliament has moved to criminalise the promotion of radical Islam, including advocating a caliphate, religious violence, and sharia law”, by Liam Deacon, Breitbart, December 7, 2017:
The Bulgarian parliament has moved to criminalise the promotion of radical Islam, including advocating a caliphate, religious violence, and sharia law.
The legislature adopted the amendments to the nation’s criminal code aimed at tackling radical Islam on their first reading this Wednesday.
They were proposed by a nationalist electoral alliance called the United Patriots (UP).
Promoting any ideology of violence or one threatening the law and constitution of the nation could be punishable with one to five years in jail and a fine of around £2,000, the Bulgarian newspaper Dnevnik reports.
UP Member of Parliament Boris Yachev told the paper that the change in law was not aimed at targeting a religion but a dangerous ideology.
Radical Islam is a particularly aggressive and dangerous ideology that justifies violence and the murder of [infidels],” he said, insisting it also excused “slavery and genocide” as a “systemic policy”. [NOTE: Why "radical Islam" and not just "Islam"? As Turkish president Erdogan has said, "Islam is Islam, and that's it!"]
His party proposed a legal definition of radical Islam, which, according to the law’s parliamentary reading, includes “when a person is agitating for the creation of an Islamic State [or caliphate]”.[NOTE: This is standard Islam.]
Other tenets are promoting religious law over secular law, the “forcible application of religious principles”, advocating violence including “sacred war against non-Muslims [jihad]”, and recruiting people into Islamist terrorism.
In June 2016, the Bulgarian parliament voted with a large majority to become the third European nation to ban the Islamic full-face veil, or burqa, finalising the law in September with a fine of around £90.
As a legacy of almost 500 years of Ottoman Turkish rule, Bulgaria has one of the biggest Muslim minorities in Europe at about 12 per cent of its 7.1 million population, Reuters reports.
Speaking in October of this year, Deputy Prime Minister Krasimir Karakachanov said: “It turns out that problems [with radical Islam] we see in a number of European countries already exist in Bulgaria.”
He claimed that “extremely liberal” laws were allowing the spread of more radical strains of Islam in education and training. [NOTE: This is dangerously misguided. Islam is the belief system based on the Koran and the sayings of Muhammad. The belief system is what it is. It does not come in radical or non-radical strains. ]

“It is mostly the… financing by private structures of religious communities that attempt to realise political influence in the country,”….



















Outlaw Islam in America


Here is an excellent way to consider going on the psychological “Psyops” offense against “radical” Islam in America that will go a long way towards putting CAIR on the defense with “moderate” Islam in America by having to explain to “moderate” Islam just how and why Islamic Sharia’h Law conforms to the U.S. Constitution:


Goggle every domestic Muslim web site you can find on the Internet.  Search those sites for the e-mail addresses of Imams, mosques and other Muslim organizations and memberships.  As you go through the web sites collecting the addresses prepare e-mail address books.  You will find Muslim Student Organizations have web pages on just about every university and college web site in America.  Go get'em!


You will end up with some amount of addresses - maybe scores or perhaps hundreds depending on how thorough you search - the more the better - and it may take you hours to prepare the books.  What could be a better use of your spare time?  If you were a Muslim in America how would you react to receiving OUTLAW ISLAM IN AMERICA perhaps hundreds of times a month from different sources?


E-mail the attached OUTLAW ISLAM IN AMERICA article to every Muslim e-mail address book you have prepared.


Don't stop with Muslims.  Google your State's Democrat and Republican Party web sites -  Search the sites for the e-mails addresses of County Leaderships and members addresses of local affiliated political clubs.  Don't bother to e-mail the elected officials listed, but have faith that they will hear from their supporters soon enough.  Better the inquires to them come from their known supporters than an outsider. 


Google the web sites and search out e-mail addresses of groups like the ACLU (especially the ACLU), FBI, CIA, SCOTUS, DOJ, Homeland Security, Secret Service, etc, school districts, police depts, county sheriff's, fire stations, first responders, social service groups like the Masons, Elks, Knights of Columbus, Rotary, veterans orgs., etc, etc.etc.  Over time, as you find the time, work to get any and every American group involved in your work through Internet contact.  Keep in mind you have targeted a specific audience, not just taking a shotgun approach to getting the word out.  You will be amazed at some of the responses you get that will let you know you're efforts are creating interest on a broad scale.  As you hear in the news about Muslim created incidents in cities or towns around the country go to the web sites of those places and e-mail pro-American, anti-Muslim information to all officials with e-mail addresses listed on those web sites.


 TIPS learned from four years experience in targeted group e-mailing you may want to note:


When setting up address books keep each book at about 40/45 names to insure the e-mail gets forwarded and not, for instance depending on your Internet Service Provider (ISP), returned as undeliverable. Also, don't mail more than one or two books per hour to prevent, again depending your Internet Service Provider's automatic SPAM detection system, from maybe blocking your outbound mail.


When e-mailing the lists use the BCC (blind carbon copy) option so each recipient may think only they received the attachment mailed; rather than realize their organization is being targeted.  


Don't send more than one mailing every month or two to any address- giving recipients time to digest the information and not overwhelming them with strange e-mail out of the blue.


As an introduction for e-mailing say something like "Don't know if you have seen the attached file before, but if not, thought you might find it informative and useful"


When getting argumentative name calling replies handle them with diplomacy by turning the tables on them, so to speak, with facts they can’t refute using their gutter tactics against them to further make your points- or simply ignore them with no reply.  It's great to argue hardcore Muslins and leftists down with facts when all they can do is resort to name calling.


When getting responses asking where you got their name usually don't tell them or simply don't reply.


When getting a response to remove that person’s name from your mailing remove them from the list.


Expect maybe one or two persons per list to ask for removal.


Continue mailing to all who reply or do not reply and expect 10/15% of the mail to be returned as non-deliverable.  Just like telephone books addresses listed change over time


In order to avoid repetition in content and plan future mailings keep records of the dates and content of each mailing.  When setting up multiple address books for the same group use a coded system something like maybe ABC1, ABC2, ABC3, etc, and this will also help you find the addresses of those who ask to be removed from your mailing.


Unless you otherwise see fit to don’t give out your street address, city, state or phone number.  Who you are is not important to recipients and they can either agree or disagree as they choose.  What’s important is that the information is getting out there to that group.  Paraphrasing, Washington, who said in support of the 1st Amendment “If the people are kept honestly aware of public issues they will do the right thing.”  In this case you are providing the honest 1st Amendment information about Islam “the people” aren’t getting from the leftist mass media.


Use this system as an education Force-Multiplier on the 2 political parties, especially the Democrat/demagogue Party where national public policy is now mostly being formulated.  Keep in mind what deceased, former 30+ year Democrat Speaker of the House, Tip ONeill,  said "all politics is local" and remember Islam in America is using the Democrat Party and the ACLU as its protected platforms for civilization jihad. 


DEFINITION : "education Force-Multiplier" One person by e-mail can rattle the cages of hundreds perhaps thousands of Muslims every month or so - just think of what a thousand people could do.


Good Luck - and if I left anything out that will help you I'll follow up -  don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions - and thanks again for your participation.


Best All American Christian anti-Islamic Regards,

Charlie Russell

PS.  If you have a printer and a copy machine there is another easy, cost free and most effective way to spread the word about Islam:  As an active American patriot you most likely receive dozens of snail mail requests each month from other patriotic organizations asking for donations.  Many of those requests will come with postage paid return envelopes.  Print out or copy information about Islam you select and use those postage free envelopes to mail it back to them and you can be sure it will get right to the top.  Too, be assured that through your informative efforts over time many other organizations will join the fight against Islam in America.

PPS. Don’t ever get discouraged.



                                                        OUTLAW ISLAM IN AMERICA    


 Attention non-Moslem America:  NO MORE 9/11 - Fort Hood massacres -

Detroit Airport - Times Square near misses - terrorist acts


                During 2008 and 2009 an undercover agent was able to penetrate, for the first time in the fifteen years of its existence, the Washington, D.C. headquarters of the Islamic fifth column conspiracy’s foremost front group in America, the so-called Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR).   As a result of the agent’s success in recovering over 12000 pages of CAIR’s internal operative documents a book, “MUSLIM MAFIA - Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America” was recently published that identifies many of the hidden ringleaders behind 9/11 and reveals Islam’s very active plans to overthrow our government, abolish the Constitution and submit America to Islam’s barbaric, militant, political/religious shariah Law.


                The Islamic conspiracy now imbedded in America is waging a stealth political and open terrorist war against us.  In their own words, from the documents recovered, all Muslims say 9/11 was just the beginning and there will be many more as needs be, as opportunities arise, until the American people give up and submit to Islamic rule – even if it takes 100 years.  The documents prove that Islam is diametrically opposed to freedom of religion guaranteed by the US Constitution.  They also prove that imams in mosques here in America are using our religious, social and political tolerances to preach sedition against the United States.


                 Islam, however, is not religiously tolerant.  It is a theocratic political system that allows no other religion to freely exist wherever it attains dominant political power: like Saudi Arabia.  Wherever Muslims take control, non-Muslins, including atheists and homosexuals, are forced to convert to Islam or maybe be allowed to pay a poll tax just to exist or maybe just be put to death. If you have any doubt about the makeup of Islam’s “religion of peace” aim to subjugate America, compare Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount to Allah’s murderous rants against the infidel (meaning you) as spelled out in the Koran and then get ready to battle for your liberty.


                Muslims in America, ever obedient to the commands of their Koran, don’t believe religious freedom comes with required allegiance to our Republic.  As freedom of speech does not allow crying fire in a crowded theater, or the right to keep and bear arms does not allow for holdup and robbery, Muslims demand their religious freedom grants them the right to disregard the Constitution in any case where the Constitution contradicts the religious social rules of their murderously intolerant Koran and shariah law. 


                Said documents reveal Muslims believe they are commanded by Allah to rule over the United States and all other countries; and if/when they are successful in Islamizing America the rest of the world will fall in line. They say, if America falls who, then, can stand against them.  Will you, Christian or Jew American, let politically religious anti-American Muslims take over your country?


                The documents also reveal relatively few of the estimated two million plus Muslims in America seem willing to blow themselves up to convert America to Islam.  Even so, to satisfy the dictates of the Koran, all Muslims are mandated to strive otherwise for shariah to rule in America, or be subject to being declared apostate with a death sentence hanging over their head.  Rep. Pete King (R-NY) of the Homeland Security Committee said when it comes to cooperating with the authorities charged with investigating terrorist cells, established here in America, Muslims are silent and uncooperative. 


Perhaps when the whole Muslim community realizes Islam will be outlawed if it doesn’t, it will stop harboring terrorists and cooperate with the FBI by turning over, known to it terrorists in its midst it says, after every attack, it does not support. 


If the Muslim community is as patriotic and loves America as much as it says it does then turning over known to it terrorists is in its best interests, right?  We’ll believe it when we see it as since the 1993 World Trade Center bombing it hasn’t.   And since its’ founding in 1995 CAIR has been pressuring imams in every mosque in America not to cooperate with the FBI.  Are Muslims to be trusted then?  Yes, if you would want to see national suicide. 


                No, if you’re interested in preserving Christian America, Muslims can’t be trusted.  Right after 9/11 President Bush said Islam was a peaceful religion.  Perhaps he can be excused because he didn’t know what Islam was all about.  However, his naïve remark went a long way towards putting, as Muslims say, America’s “useful idiots” to sleep about Islam’s plan to conquer America from within.  Obama, however, whose father was a Muslim, says America is not a Christian nation, went to Saudi Arabia and bowed to its king fully aware that Saudi princes are helping finance the Muslim Mafia.  What‘s Obama’s explanation for kissing up to Islam?  Obviously, based on his own words and deeds, Obama believes he was elected to be the Muslim in Chief of America.  As time goes by Islam will find itself closer to deportation back to where it came from as a majority of Americans united on this issue will see to it. 


                 We need a return of the House Un-American Activities Committee and your pledge to support it.  Islam has enlisted support from the Communist ACLU, Congressional Black Caucus, big shot “progressives” in D.C., liberal academia and news outlets.  Religiously the Koran forbids Muslims to swear allegiance to the Constitution.  Oh, you didn’t know that?  So they have no right to be in America.   Screw PC and “sensitivity.”  Americans must round up these arrogant religious invaders and deport them NOW.  It’s time to put totalitarian, homicidal Islam on the defensive by calling for a Constitutional Amendment to Outlaw Islam in America. 


Besides all the bull crap from Obama about “Islam always being a part of our American family,” which has no basis in fact and is just another of his bold face lies, the Islamic community as a whole  has never contributed anything to America except universal public apprehension and fear of more promised terrorism.  Some say “but not all Muslims are terrorists.”  Oh really?  Then let Muslims put their own house in order or too bad for them.  Not every Jap bombed Pearl Harbor either, but they all paid the ultimate price for it.  

                A study of the Koran and 1400 years of Islamic history; American history from “the shores of Tripoli” to Muslims in  the post Spanish American War Philippines, to Afghanistan, shows that political warlike Islam has never been warded off by the West other than by armed brute force.   But, by enforcing our laws regarding sedition disguised as religion and our vote in 2012 we can stop Islam at the ballot box, bloodlessly, by electing a natural born American President who will call for OUTLAWING ISLAM IN AMERICA.


Should 1st Amendment Religious Freedom for Moslems Outweigh 1st Amendment Freedom of Speech for Non-Moslem?



Print Print | Sitemap
Created with 1&1 WebsiteBuilder